Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - Data Services and Data Quality
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3719

Advice for unique client copy requirement for HANA data

$
0
0

With so many products with overlapping functionality, I know there are many ways to achieve what is required, but I'd like to start a discussion to help decide on the best solution.  I don't want to miss any key considerations including roadmaps.

 

Background

 

  • We are developing an application that is using the HANA as the database.
  • Similar to most SAP products, multi-tenancy is application defined by using a tenant/client field on tables containing data for multiple clients/tenants.
    • So far, the tenant key field is not called MANDT or CLIENT and is not in the first position of each table
  • The data dictionary is maintained outside of HANA. Core Data Services is not used.
  • This client does not have any netweaver instances

 

Requirement

 

  • We need to be able to do a client/tenant copy. That is, copy all of the data from hundreds of tables where tenant_key = <tenant_code> to the respective tables in a different database.
  • Ideally, we would also do transforms on fields with sensitive data along the way if we're copying from production.
  • This needs to be configurable and repeatable between different databases.

 

Possible solutions

 

  • SAP HANA Enterprise Information Management (EIM)
  • SAP Landscape Transformation
  • SAP BusinesObjects Data Services
  • SAP Test Data Migration Server (TDMS)

 

So far it looks like Data Services is the best option because it offers better flexibility and management - specifically to choose the source and destination. HANA EIM doesn't have a central management repository like Data Services.

I think TDMS relies on RFC, so I'm pretty sure that's not even a contender for that reason alone.

Is SLT flexible enough?

 

OR, should the application-defined multi-tenancy approach be dropped entirely and we use HANA database containers for each client?  This generally seems to be the new strategy and is well suited to hosted/cloud situation.

 

I really appreciate your thoughts.  Thank you.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 3719

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>